.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

paisajes naturales puerto rico

paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • SandynJosh
    Nov 24, 09:20 AM
    That's like shooting yourself in the foot! Morons!

    Hehehe...more like shooting a bit higher.





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • duffman9000
    Jul 22, 11:43 AM
    Negative? How can this news be negative? Only the most diehard G4 lovers would call this news negative.





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • 2992
    Mar 31, 04:32 AM
    Downloading now!
    Congrats! That's almost an achievement! We all of us should know about it! :rolleyes:





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto
  • paisajes naturales puerto



  • BWhaler
    Sep 16, 12:11 AM
    To be fair, I think you are thinking of MacOSRumors (MOSR), not MacOSXRumors. The former have a terrible record in regards to rumours (ie they make up everything), while the latter seem to be a bit more reliable. Shame they are named so similarly though.

    You're right.

    Thanks for the correction.





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • Stridder44
    Sep 11, 02:36 AM
    Mine connection would take around 14 hours, but we have adsl 2+ now which is up to 24mb/sec. Can't wait to upgrade :cool:

    This movie store is all exciting and all, but with out world stores, it will be the US who will be enjoying it :(


    Holy eff. Im in the states and Im only gettin 786/384 :mad:

    Then again we get it for free...but still....





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto
  • paisajes naturales puerto



  • Velmonk
    Sep 16, 04:26 PM
    2.16 and 2.33 Merom options
    Magnetic latch
    MacBook style keyboard
    New video card (Nvidia?)
    160GB hard drive option

    IMO, these are the least that Apple can do to keep up with other high performance notebooks in the market. I think new MBP's will arrive one the same day as Photokina although they may not be highlighted at the event.

    the keyboard is the main reason i didn't buy a macbook





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • paul4339
    Apr 26, 02:18 PM
    it's interesting to see Windows mobile/WP7 at 7% of new purchases (compared to 25% for iOS) ... I didn't realize it was so popular.

    P.





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • ddeadserious
    Apr 26, 02:46 PM
    iOS is stale.

    They haven't made an significant UI changes since 2007.

    While Apple can continue to release a beautifully engineered and sleek phone, they need to focus on making iOS up to par with the features that Android offers.

    In terms of OS, the only thing iOS seems to do better is simply being more stable.

    I sold my iPhone 4 last month and bought an Android phone. The only thing I miss? The retina display and the Facebook app. I'm willing to deal with a bit of instability for the immense amount of extra functionality that Android offers.





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales wallpaper.
  • paisajes naturales wallpaper.



  • McGiord
    Apr 11, 06:24 AM
    I already took that into account. Can't you see?

    48/2(12) is something we should all be able to agree on. anything in parentheses must be evaluated before anything else.

    x/y(a+b) becomes x/y(c). That's the P in PEMDAS and it's done. At this point there are only multiply and divide operations left. This is just x/y*c which should be evaluated left to right. Because it is indistinguishable from x*d*c = x*(1/y)*c. I can commute operands to get x*c*(1/y) and rewrite that as xc/y should I want to.

    B
    That statement means that 2(12) should be done before the division.
    So then the answer is 2.





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • balamw
    Apr 9, 09:15 PM
    Tastes great. (who's with me):p
    Given your argument I would have thought you'd represent "less filling". :p

    B





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • ChazUK
    Apr 18, 03:39 PM
    Apple scared of the competition and trying to sue them.

    No. They're protecting their IP.





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales. paisajes
  • paisajes naturales. paisajes



  • iJohnHenry
    Apr 9, 07:19 PM
    Do you really think the answer is 2? lol.

    Yes, if you assume the (9+3) is a power.

    No, if you assume there is a fantom multiplier between the 2 and the (9+3).

    It's a loaded question, due to incomplete specifications, yet again.

    Takes me back to my User days. Kill them all!!! :mad:





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • Dont Hurt Me
    Aug 7, 02:17 PM
    Powerful system for sure but looking at this thing it seems the base unit is a workstation to me. The 7300 GPU is a $99 Gpu so I was surprised they went so low with the base graphics. Good thing you can build like you want it and they offer better GPu's but it wont be cheap. Cpu wise its kicks rear end just as its expansion now does and can hold 4 GPU's:eek: PowerMac is again a butt kicking machine. Twice as fast as old & slow quad G5 thats kind of funny. At least this gigantic tower can put things into all that space now:) There is a gigantic hole now for the user with a monitor. MacMini and ProMac......hmmmm when is the next show?

    As a side note a AMD3500/6800GT combo will still hammer the base unit in Doom3:p





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • DavidLeblond
    May 4, 03:01 PM
    Why put it in the App Store if it isn't an App?

    Because it has a payment system and delivery system in place.

    But it isn't an app. It's an OS upgrade.





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • ptysell
    May 6, 12:29 AM
    Can always have a system with ARM AND x86 CPUs.





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto
  • paisajes naturales puerto



  • strider42
    Apr 18, 03:51 PM
    They have patents but they HAVE to pursue infringers or they can lose the rights to the patents. That's why you see so many patent lawsuits. Unfortunately, that's just how the system works (in very basic terms).

    You're thinking of trademark law. Patents are awarded for a specific period of time. You can't lose them just because you don't defend them. You can sue at any time.

    Its only trademarks that you have to protect in order to keep them.

    You see so many patent lawsuits because there's money in it and to stifle competition. There is no other reason.





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • mscriv
    May 5, 07:51 PM
    FYI: my instructions have been sent in to the storytellers, we are just waiting on them.





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • rwilliams
    Mar 28, 10:31 AM
    what an overly dramatic confused statement

    You have to consider who's making that statement.





    paisajes naturales puerto rico. paisajes naturales puerto rico
  • paisajes naturales puerto rico



  • kalsta
    May 6, 11:15 PM
    I didn't say that at all.

    Certain things are good for one thing but not as good for another. Basing your metrics off of water and light make a lot of sense when you have to measure a great deal of new items and compare them objectively.

    On the other hand when you need metrics to be a guide through daily life and nothing else, the system that's born from daily necessity makes a lot more sense.

    Daily necessity? Is measuring your foot a daily necessity? I don't get what you're trying to say here.

    Some defenders of the Imperial system tell us it's handy to measure in body parts, presumably because you all have them. But what percentage of US citizens honestly have foot-long feet? Perhaps half a foot should be called a penis? (Credit to rdowns for that idea.)

    The reasoning gets worse when you'd ask 311 million to make a change because a smaller community of professionals would like their standards to be the standards for all of society. It's not like the two can't coexist; there might be a good argument there if the two were incompatible, but the fact is that they're not.

    Can't you concede that there is a benefit to having a single 'standard'? The two are only compatible in the sense that you can convert between them if you know the conversion factors. Every time someone has to do this, they are wasting time. Multiply that over 311 million people and you have an awful lot of wasted time!

    A distinction needs to be made here: just because something is easier to multiply by 10 (or 1/10th) doesn't mean that it's easier to use. How many times in your daily life do you need to multiply by 10 �

    You multiply or divide by a multiple of 10 every time you need to convert from one derivative unit to another. 'Kilo' means a multiple of 1000 over the base unit. So if I need to convert from kilometres to metres, I simply divide by 1000. Now, that happens to be very easy to do. Why? Because our whole system of counting is base 10! It's as easy as moving the decimal point three places.

    � or even multiply what you measure?

    It doesn't matter what operations you're doing � multiplication, division, addition, or subtraction � it's as easy as manipulating any decimal number. You never, ever have to remember odd conversion factors to convert between different units and fractions thereof.

    How often does that easy arithmetic come up outside of science? Can you think of a real life example?

    I do a bit of carpentry and other work around the house. From time to time I'm buying lengths of timber, so I may be multiplying a required length over the number of lengths required, or adding up different lengths. If you're a cook, no doubt there are times when the recipe serves 4 people, but you need to cook for 6 or 8 or something, so you have to multiply measurements. When I used to go swimming at my local Olympic sized pool (which is 50 metres long) it was easy to calculate how far I swam. 20 laps = 1000 metres = 1 kilometre. I mean, I could go on and on giving you everyday examples if you want me to, but I think you're capable of doing that yourself.

    I don't think Tomorrow ever responded to my earlier hypothetical, so let me put the same question to you:

    Okay, imagine for a moment that one of the US states wasn't using the decimal system for counting. Instead, they had a system where letters were used to designate certain amounts, similar to Roman numerals, but instead of having a base of 10, it varied. So perhaps A is equal to 12. Then three As is equal to B. Two Bs is equal to C. 22 Bs is equal to a D, and so on with this kind of inconsistency. You have a friend living in this state who claims that the system works just fine � he spent many years studying this system and even more using it in his line of work and can't see why he or anyone else in the state should have to learn this dangfangled decimal system. What would you say to your friend?

    In any case, I do already have it. It's on every measuring device I have, from my ruler to my bathroom scale. I use it when it's necessary or more effective, but that's rare. Maybe you should accept that people can have a different preference.

    But (1) it's not your first 'language' so to speak, so you're no doubt less comfortable with it, and (2) if no one else around you speaks the same 'language' it doesn't help you communicate with them. This is why we have 'standards'.





    Vitruviux
    Apr 20, 06:17 AM
    Keep the shape the same, I like iPhone 4's design, a lot.

    Here's my criteria for an upgrade...

    -iPhone 4 design
    -Dual core A5 with SGX543MP2 GPU
    -1GB RAM - I don't think this will happen but would've been nice!
    -64GB Storage
    -8MP Camera capable of 1080p recording(but there must be a 720/1080 switch iOS) - With good lens and sensor, I want Galaxy S II like images
    -Wi-Fi Direct
    -Bluetooth 3.0(hopefully iOS will take advantage of this)
    -Revamped and much improved iOS 5 with notifications, live icons and other features we're all been asking for added/fixed.





    Radoo
    Apr 18, 03:57 PM
    shame really that Apple is resorting to Microsoft-esque tactics. If you can't beat em, just sue em, mentality.

    Thats like saying that Coca-Cola should sue Pepsi

    Xerox PARC should have aggressively sued Apple when the GUI was becoming commercialized.

    NO, Apple did not invent the first GUI Operating System. Xerox made the first GUI in their Alto systems. Xerox only sued (late for that matter) when Apple sued Microsoft for their GUI OS (Windows).

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/Xerox_Alto.jpg/240px-Xerox_Alto.jpg
    Look's just like an iMac! :eek: almost... Stupid patents... Good for Xerox, too bad that playing fair is not helping these days...:mad:





    BuffyzDead
    Apr 18, 02:53 PM
    Only in Business where two companies that are active partners, as Samsung is a major Vendor to Apple, can they this happen.

    Of Course Apple is right to sue.

    I always imagined that when Apple sends over all the blueprints, for the technologies/products that Apple asks Samsung to build, those Blueprints go right to Samsung R&D. To copy and learn from.





    milbournosphere
    Mar 29, 12:06 PM
    I don't trust corporate clouds, especially with a service that Sony is clearly gunning for legally.

    I suggest Subsonic. It streams music from your Mac or PC to your iPhone, Android phone, or Win7 phone. It also allows you to stream from another computer via a web browser. And it's free! Own your data, create your own cloud.

    http://www.subsonic.org/pages/index.jsp





    MacNut
    Apr 9, 09:36 PM
    So if the parentheses are solved first why not just put them in front? Why go through all the semantics? Do scientists purposely make it this hard when solving equations?